<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recursive affordances</title>
	<link>http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2008/02/09/recursive-affordances/</link>
	<description>mind/tech bazar from outer space</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Stéphane S.</title>
		<link>http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2008/02/09/recursive-affordances/#comment-456978</link>
		<author>Stéphane S.</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2008/02/09/recursive-affordances/#comment-456978</guid>
		<description>Can't you call it simply a Rhematic-Iconic-Qualisign according to Peirce's Theory of Signs ?

(see http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/peirce-semiotics/#TenClaSig for instance) 

But I am not very sure of the relationship between affordance and semiotics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t you call it simply a Rhematic-Iconic-Qualisign according to Peirce&#8217;s Theory of Signs ?</p>
<p>(see <a href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/peirce-semiotics/#TenClaSig" rel="nofollow">http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/peirce-semiotics/#TenClaSig</a> for instance) </p>
<p>But I am not very sure of the relationship between affordance and semiotics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
