<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paul Dourish on reflective HCI</title>
	<link>http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2008/01/25/paul-dourish-on-reflective-hci/</link>
	<description>mind/tech bazar from outer space</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 04:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Wynne-Morgan</title>
		<link>http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2008/01/25/paul-dourish-on-reflective-hci/#comment-455430</link>
		<author>Tom Wynne-Morgan</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2008/01/25/paul-dourish-on-reflective-hci/#comment-455430</guid>
		<description>Nice post...i skimmed over the paper by Paul too. I think i might have to disagree with Chris on this one (i don't do that too often). I think the level that people like Tony Dunne work at is very much inspiration and provocation for the discipline...navel gazing to take a negative slant on it. However from the little that i have experience of the UI/UE world, they are simultaneously crying out for this bigger picture, this critique on cultural value etc. The only difference is that they need it in their own language. Maybe what Paul is getting at is that the lexicon and points of reference need re-positioning. Creating a new, iterative process that embeds usability design into the larger context all the time. By all account,s its not an easy thing to do since on a first pass they seem at odds with each other. That's my two pence anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post&#8230;i skimmed over the paper by Paul too. I think i might have to disagree with Chris on this one (i don&#8217;t do that too often). I think the level that people like Tony Dunne work at is very much inspiration and provocation for the discipline&#8230;navel gazing to take a negative slant on it. However from the little that i have experience of the UI/UE world, they are simultaneously crying out for this bigger picture, this critique on cultural value etc. The only difference is that they need it in their own language. Maybe what Paul is getting at is that the lexicon and points of reference need re-positioning. Creating a new, iterative process that embeds usability design into the larger context all the time. By all account,s its not an easy thing to do since on a first pass they seem at odds with each other. That&#8217;s my two pence anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plus six &#187; links for 2008-01-29</title>
		<link>http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2008/01/25/paul-dourish-on-reflective-hci/#comment-455371</link>
		<author>plus six &#187; links for 2008-01-29</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 23:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2008/01/25/paul-dourish-on-reflective-hci/#comment-455371</guid>
		<description>[...] Paul Dourish on reflective HCI (Pasta&#38;Vinegar) HCI meets critical practice maybe (tags: design theory hci dourish criticaldesign criticaltechnicalpractice ctp sengers) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Paul Dourish on reflective HCI (Pasta&#38;Vinegar) HCI meets critical practice maybe (tags: design theory hci dourish criticaldesign criticaltechnicalpractice ctp sengers) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Putting People First in italiano</title>
		<link>http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2008/01/25/paul-dourish-on-reflective-hci/#comment-455351</link>
		<author>Putting People First in italiano</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2008/01/25/paul-dourish-on-reflective-hci/#comment-455351</guid>
		<description>[...] Pasta&#38;Vinegar)          &#160;    Scrivi un [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Pasta&amp;Vinegar)          &nbsp;    Scrivi un [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2008/01/25/paul-dourish-on-reflective-hci/#comment-455242</link>
		<author>Chris</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2008/01/25/paul-dourish-on-reflective-hci/#comment-455242</guid>
		<description>Surely the point of reflective practice is to critique and develop the discipline itself and its processes, rather than expecting "pragmatic actions" that can be immediately applied to products...?  Put another way its "audience" is practioners themselves, not clients and end-users.

Thanks for the heads-up on this.  I will look for the Sengers/CTP stuff as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely the point of reflective practice is to critique and develop the discipline itself and its processes, rather than expecting &#8220;pragmatic actions&#8221; that can be immediately applied to products&#8230;?  Put another way its &#8220;audience&#8221; is practioners themselves, not clients and end-users.</p>
<p>Thanks for the heads-up on this.  I will look for the Sengers/CTP stuff as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Putting people first &#187; Recent publications by Prof. Paul Dourish</title>
		<link>http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2008/01/25/paul-dourish-on-reflective-hci/#comment-454909</link>
		<author>Putting people first &#187; Recent publications by Prof. Paul Dourish</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2008/01/25/paul-dourish-on-reflective-hci/#comment-454909</guid>
		<description>[...] Pasta&#38;Vinegar)          &#160;    Leave a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Pasta&amp;Vinegar)          &nbsp;    Leave a [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
