Should ants be the next model for urban computing?

Stigmergic Collaboration is a model for the self-organisation of ants, artificial life and swarm intelligence. Wikipedia defines it as “a method of indirect communication in a self-organizing emergent system where its individual parts communicate with one another by modifying their local environment”. It emerges from the work of a french biologist who coined the term in conjunction with his research o termites behavior.

As described by Mark Elliott:

Pierre-Paul Grasse first coined the term stigmergy in the 1950s in conjunction with his research on termites. Grasse showed that a particular configuration of a termite’s environment (as in the case of building and maintaining a nest) triggered a response in a termite to modify its environment, with the resulting modification in turn stimulating the response of the original or a second worker to further transform its environment. Thus the regulation and coordination of the building and maintaining of a nest was dependent upon stimulation provided by the nest, as opposed to an inherent knowledge of nest building on the individual termite’s part.

Why do I blog this? Although I won’t enter in the big debate about how this model can be translated to human/behavior (ants/termites =! human beings), I think that stigmergic collaboration is a very interesting notion to understand the future of urban computing. Coordination is explained through the use and production of artefacts by the individuals, for example collective nest building, or the production of chemical traces. What is interesting is the notion of “artefact production”, humans do not leave and rely so much on chemical traces BUT their activity in the environment leaves traces… especially if you think about mobile phone/bluetooth/wifi interactions.

4 Responses to “Should ants be the next model for urban computing?”

  1. joss Says:

    - Stigmergic behaviors are used to solve complex problems. It has been used with digital ant colonies to clusturize multidimensional data on 2D maps. A good introduction is given in this lecture of the EPFL.

    - Stigmergy is a form of non-symbolic communication. Stigmergic signals are however still signals, i.e. they they convey signs that follow, by definition, a convention to be understood. A definition that seems to be disrgarding Jason Lanier quoted by Rémi Sussan. The sign performs the transition from data to information. The examples of communication based on transforming avatars he gives are no exception : meaning rely on shared interpretation of the signs transmitted.

  2. Nicolas Nova Says:

    I agree on the two points.

    More specifically I find the second one very important: the notion of signal and the fact that it is communication. That’s why I like this as a metaphor to play with for urban computing.

  3. michiel Says:

    Hi Nicolas, you may find an interesting essay by PhD student Victor Bedö called “From Locative Information to Urban Knowledge ” in the last pre-proceedings (3.6 MB) (p. 33-35) of the “Nyírí conference” of 2007. Bedö also uses the ant metaphor to talk about the ’strong emergence’ of overarching structures by locative mappings in seemingly ant-like behavior.

  4. Nicolas Nova Says:

    Thanks!

Leave a Reply