<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dark data to be set free</title>
	<link>http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2007/10/31/dark-data-to-be-set-free/</link>
	<description>mind/tech bazar from outer space</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 23:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: 7.5th Floor &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sustainable Socio-Technical Mobility Systems</title>
		<link>http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2007/10/31/dark-data-to-be-set-free/#comment-444942</link>
		<author>7.5th Floor &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sustainable Socio-Technical Mobility Systems</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 22:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2007/10/31/dark-data-to-be-set-free/#comment-444942</guid>
		<description>[...] Relation to my thesis: The co-evolution mentioned in this issue focuses on the mutual shaping processes between all kinds of urban artefacts (road networks, buildings, street furniture, etc.) and social practices (shopping routines, perceptions of safety, commuting patterns, etc.). Now, new urban technologies (GPS, wireless networks, Near-field communication) also support mobility systems and impact the social practices and vice-versa. The analysis of this process should certainly inspire from previous work in urbanism and sustainable architecture. Finally, I particularly enjoy that the editor calls for the analysis of both failed and successful projects conducted under the flag of sustainability. It is particularly rare in research to considure failure as an outcome as already mentioned by Nicolas in Dark data to be set free. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Relation to my thesis: The co-evolution mentioned in this issue focuses on the mutual shaping processes between all kinds of urban artefacts (road networks, buildings, street furniture, etc.) and social practices (shopping routines, perceptions of safety, commuting patterns, etc.). Now, new urban technologies (GPS, wireless networks, Near-field communication) also support mobility systems and impact the social practices and vice-versa. The analysis of this process should certainly inspire from previous work in urbanism and sustainable architecture. Finally, I particularly enjoy that the editor calls for the analysis of both failed and successful projects conducted under the flag of sustainability. It is particularly rare in research to considure failure as an outcome as already mentioned by Nicolas in Dark data to be set free. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
