<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Space and place consideration in the use of public WiFi</title>
	<link>http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2007/10/18/space-and-place-consideration-in-the-use-of-public-wifi/</link>
	<description>mind/tech bazar from outer space</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: blog on blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Space and place consideration in the use of public WiFi</title>
		<link>http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2007/10/18/space-and-place-consideration-in-the-use-of-public-wifi/#comment-444183</link>
		<author>blog on blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Space and place consideration in the use of public WiFi</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 15:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2007/10/18/space-and-place-consideration-in-the-use-of-public-wifi/#comment-444183</guid>
		<description>[...] Space and place consideration in the use of public WiFi: &#8220; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Space and place consideration in the use of public WiFi: &#8220; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike McHugh</title>
		<link>http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2007/10/18/space-and-place-consideration-in-the-use-of-public-wifi/#comment-443936</link>
		<author>Mike McHugh</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2007/10/18/space-and-place-consideration-in-the-use-of-public-wifi/#comment-443936</guid>
		<description>Of course, given the events described at http://blogs.csoonline.com/cyberterrorism_exposed_by_the_colbert_report the hypothetical worker could be quite right to feel uneasy. I guess it extends the definition of a gatekeeper somewhat, given that the wifi provider expressed no concerns about the access, but a 3rd party did on their behalf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, given the events described at <a href="http://blogs.csoonline.com/cyberterrorism_exposed_by_the_colbert_report" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.csoonline.com/cyberterrorism_exposed_by_the_colbert_report</a> the hypothetical worker could be quite right to feel uneasy. I guess it extends the definition of a gatekeeper somewhat, given that the wifi provider expressed no concerns about the access, but a 3rd party did on their behalf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
