<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Infrastructures as indicators</title>
	<link>http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2007/08/23/infrasructures-as-indicators/</link>
	<description>mind/tech bazar from outer space</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: ville</title>
		<link>http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2007/08/23/infrasructures-as-indicators/#comment-436182</link>
		<author>ville</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2007/08/23/infrasructures-as-indicators/#comment-436182</guid>
		<description>A year ago I presented in some seminar where one of the pioneers of participatory design of ICTs, &lt;a href="http://portal.acm.org/results.cfm?query=author%3APelle%20Ehn" rel="nofollow"&gt;Pelle Ehn&lt;/a&gt; was part of the audience. I tried to present some stuff about classification as infrastructure and why its needed and what it is, with also referring to Bowker &#38; Star (if I remember right). Ehn then suggested that maybe it's not so much the question of 'WHAT infrastructure/classification are' but 'WHEN infrastructure and classification are'.. I was a bit puzzled about the enigmatic comment, but later it has started to make more and more sense. What I think, he meant, was about considering infrastructure as situated and dynamic even if it doesn't appear that way. 

Another interesting way to think about infrastructure is that it's a byproduct of activity. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A year ago I presented in some seminar where one of the pioneers of participatory design of ICTs, <a href="http://portal.acm.org/results.cfm?query=author%3APelle%20Ehn" rel="nofollow">Pelle Ehn</a> was part of the audience. I tried to present some stuff about classification as infrastructure and why its needed and what it is, with also referring to Bowker &amp; Star (if I remember right). Ehn then suggested that maybe it&#8217;s not so much the question of &#8216;WHAT infrastructure/classification are&#8217; but &#8216;WHEN infrastructure and classification are&#8217;.. I was a bit puzzled about the enigmatic comment, but later it has started to make more and more sense. What I think, he meant, was about considering infrastructure as situated and dynamic even if it doesn&#8217;t appear that way. </p>
<p>Another interesting way to think about infrastructure is that it&#8217;s a byproduct of activity. <img src='http://liftlab.com/think/nova/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
