<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WAPI is back&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2008/03/21/wapi-is-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2008/03/21/wapi-is-back/</link>
	<description>Time to look East...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 05:48:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Laperrouza &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WAPI or WIMAX?</title>
		<link>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2008/03/21/wapi-is-back/comment-page-1/#comment-1961</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Laperrouza &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WAPI or WIMAX?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2008/03/21/wapi-is-back/#comment-1961</guid>
		<description>[...] was given the green light to reapply for international recognition by the ISO - it had been rejected before on two counts. Part may also come from the fact that ISO has been encouraging China and the IEEE to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was given the green light to reapply for international recognition by the ISO &#8211; it had been rejected before on two counts. Part may also come from the fact that ISO has been encouraging China and the IEEE to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

