Archive for the ‘reboot’ Category

The intelligence of wikipedia (Jimbo Wales)

Tuesday, June 14th, 2005

Founder of wikipedia (and all the other wiki initiatives)
Amazing things accomplished by these people. They created on of the web’s top 100 website in less than 4 years.


Photo by mac steve

  • An interesting stat on wikipedia:
    0.7% of users make 50% of the content (= 530+ people)
    2% of users make 73.4% of the content (=1470+ people)

  • Wikipedia quality is ensured by the software archiving system and a very dynamic, uncodified yet powerful “voting/discussion” system between users when problems arise on content

  • Wikipedia is a constitutional monarchy. People are free but there is a need for an ultimate voice to arbitrate on some matters. They are transitioning to total democracy but very carefully because people can turn their values against them, by organizing artificially massive votes on a particular matter (example of neo-nazis trying to turn down some historiy articles, asking their network to pound wikipedia)

  • Wikipedia faces 3 challenges to further scale it’s model: – software/automation of certain tasks is gonna be necessary – arbitration on political/philosophical issues – preserve a model built on “Love and respect”

  • Keynote (Robert Scoble)

    Tuesday, June 14th, 2005

    Microsoft geek blogger. Chief humanizing officer as Fortune puts it.
    The star of the show, Scoble delivers a speech on nothing and everything. He’s actually speaking while the IRC channel of the conference is projected on the screen behind him. Quite a cool way of conferencing I think, as people can interact with what he says on the fly. It actually illustrates the principle of blogs, one person driving debates with an audience enriching and correcting almost immediately. It obviously becomes a problem once you have all the geeks trying to crack jokes on the screen but fortunately for us the channel went down before it happened.

    Some points he made:

  • people blog for 5 reasons:
    1. it’s really easy to publish these days
    2. indexing got much better, anybody can get listed by the big search engines (vs a few years ago when getting your site on yahoo was complicated and time consuming)
    3. linking behaviour -> you know on the fly who’s linking to you, who’s talking about you, that’s stimulating
    4. permalinks, the fact that content providers made their content “bloggable” by providing permalinks
    5. syndication

  • blogs will persist because of google, because blogs are the best way to exist in the rankings

  • Before we were in a world where consumers had to go through intermediaries before they could reach a product maker. From client -> marketing -> product we now have client -> product.
    That means people can find products more easily, and talk directly to the person who makes it. It’s much more efficient for everybody.

  • Microsoft receives praises from it’s clients for the undergoing blogging efforts (Scoble shows an email from a MS VP who cites clients). Clients are happy to: – talk straight to people who make the product they use – be able to provide feedback – understand why certain choices are made, i.e. understand the constraints of the producer – fell empowered, more respected, heard
    Overall openess has created huge value for the clients, therefore for Microsoft.

  • “Blogs are a tree, not a forest” -> blogs are the tip of the iceberg, they are not an end. For sure bob.

  • He talks about how cool map.search.ch is one of the coolest service he’s seen so far. I actually met the guys yesterday, really cool people, and their service is quite amazing. Check scoble’s post about it here.

  • Why blogs matter (Jason Calacanis)

    Tuesday, June 14th, 2005

    Founder of weblogs inc, he has a nice blog and has already blogged about the people who blogged him after his conference on blogs (…).


    Photo by Heiko.

    The most interesting speech so far. Funny, experienced and insightful person. He’s the only one who talked about the future. Here are some point he made (interesting points start at the third paragraph hang in there):

  • Jason talks about CCJ or Collaborative Citizen Journalism. The power of what’s happening with blogs does not come from individuals taken as individuals but as a whole. Blogs get their value from the fact that they are exposed, discussed and debated sources of information.

  • To illustrate the power of blogs, Jason recounted the story of a fight they had with an american manufacturer:
    – he reviews a product positively on his blog
    – a reader comments, says that there have been issues with the product
    – a new post is made, reconsidering the positive verdict on the product
    – the company sends a legal letter to ask him to remove the negative opinion
    – he manages to make the company understand the potentially devastating effects of going the law way (the blog has thousands of readers daily)
    – the manufacturer issues some kind of disclaimer on their site, like “you might have heard that some people claim that our product sucks, don’t listen”
    – jason delivered the final blow by uncovering a paper that proved the company had been sued on the subject, was aware of it and did not move
    – the manufacturer had to admit their mistake, and their reputation was done

    (I’m sure I missed a few things here but you get the point: consumer have the power to force corporations to face their mistakes). “Blogs are really more powerful than you think”

  • Jason points to how this whole story (read above) could never appear in the traditional media. They do not publish readers comment, can not work stories like that, as they develop. They are not reactive enough. Some information can not be passed by the traditional media

  • Blogging is like throwing many tiny snowballs on top of a mountain. Some will stop after a few meters, some will become avalanches. You don’t know which one but it happens.

  • Blogs are subject to an increasing pressure, face challenges to their integrity. He showed some emails he got from Siemens proposing to pay flights and hotels for engadget editors so they can go to a particular tech show in exchange of some presence in the posts. Engadget refused, and weirdly the first seven posts of Gizmodo (their main competitor) on that show were on Siemens products… Really weird ;-) and to be expected.

  • RSS = Real Simple Stealing. As a publisher of 80+ blogs, Jason sees more and more of the following:
    – I syndicate feeds, or create a new feed via a technorati watchlist for example.
    – I create a web site that displays the feeds
    – I put some google adwords on the site
    – I make money from content I do not generate.

    Jason thinks that at some point publishers will turn off RSS feeds.

  • We all heard that blogs are not good sources because they do no fact checking. This is not true, readers comment = realtime fact checking, much more powerful than traditional media fact checking. If the NYT makes a mistake, it is gonna correct it one week later in a tiny column on page xx. Blogs talk about their mistakes, stand up dans take the hit -> users are in the know much faster.

  • The evolution of the search for truth:
    Before the internet, Media detained most of the truth

    Before blogs, Media and people detained the truth

    Now the truth is shared by media, citizens and bloggers, with people navigating from one category to the other

  • Jason is about to launch on one of his blogs a “star system”. The idea is to recognize that readers can be bloggers, and that readers can for free improve the content of the site. So he has:
    – a certain number of editors for this blog, shown on the right side of the site
    – when an editor appreciates a reader’s comment (=thinks the comment has value) he “stars” the comment, the reader gets one point.
    – readers are ranked below the editors, and clicking on a reader’s name takes you to that person’s website.
    So this system is encouraging people to contribute and is valorizing the right person. More content, quality content, for free. Smart

  • Jason finished by saying that he has an increased number of bloggers that acquire fame and credibility on one particular blog, then move to another blog in parallel. Their credibility follows them (not amazingly).