Compensating for ideal design

Posted: July 3rd, 2009 | 2 Comments »

Fascinating development around electric cars, devices that are so silent they become dangerous for pedestrians used to the noise of our good old explosion engines. Why not also add a fume spitting vapor at the back of the car?

Japan’s near-silent hybrid cars have been called dangerous by the vision-impaired and some users, prompting a government review on whether to add a noise-making device [...]

“Blind people depend on sounds when they walk, but there are no engine sounds from hybrid vehicles when running at low speed” and on the electric motor, he said.

Link


2 Comments on “Compensating for ideal design”

  1. 1 Nik said at 15:29 on July 3rd, 2009:

    Hi Laurent,

    … Which reminds me of the way ‘click’ sounds were added to digital cameras … first as a(n optional) feedback mechanism to enhance the user experience (i.e. knowing when a picture was taken), later an enforced requirement in some countries for cellphone cameras so that people could actually hear when you took a picture of them. Yes, upskirt cellphone pictures on Japanese subways had something to do with that ;-)

    As for the cars, indeed some refer to them being silent as “It’s a bug, not a feature”.

    Best,

    Nik

  2. 2 laurent said at 17:56 on July 3rd, 2009:

    What happens when our kids hear that shutter sound? Do they know what it refers to? Probably not… So what do they think?


Leave a Reply


  • 3 - three =