<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The cause of flame wars</title>
	<link>http://liftlab.com/think/laurent/2006/02/13/the-cause-of-flame-wars/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on a changing society.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Laurent Haug&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Email vs phone</title>
		<link>http://liftlab.com/think/laurent/2006/02/13/the-cause-of-flame-wars/#comment-5563</link>
		<author>Laurent Haug&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Email vs phone</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 08:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liftlab.com/think/laurent/2006/02/13/the-cause-of-flame-wars/#comment-5563</guid>
		<description>[...] data on email interpretation (see previous post here).  Link (via [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] data on email interpretation (see previous post here).  Link (via [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurent</title>
		<link>http://liftlab.com/think/laurent/2006/02/13/the-cause-of-flame-wars/#comment-342</link>
		<author>Laurent</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 16:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liftlab.com/think/laurent/2006/02/13/the-cause-of-flame-wars/#comment-342</guid>
		<description>Thx for the complement of information. This interpretation of text thing is increasingly important in a world where &lt;a href="http://tecfa.unige.ch/perso/staf/nova/blog/2006/01/20/the-economist-on-knowledge-workers/" rel="nofollow" &gt;email is the most used way of communication&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thx for the complement of information. This interpretation of text thing is increasingly important in a world where <a href="http://tecfa.unige.ch/perso/staf/nova/blog/2006/01/20/the-economist-on-knowledge-workers/" rel="nofollow" >email is the most used way of communication</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurent</title>
		<link>http://liftlab.com/think/laurent/2006/02/13/the-cause-of-flame-wars/#comment-943</link>
		<author>Laurent</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 16:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liftlab.com/think/laurent/2006/02/13/the-cause-of-flame-wars/#comment-943</guid>
		<description>Thx for the complement of information. This interpretation of text thing is increasingly important in a world where &lt;a href="http://tecfa.unige.ch/perso/staf/nova/blog/2006/01/20/the-economist-on-knowledge-workers/" rel="nofollow" &gt;email is the most used way of communication&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thx for the complement of information. This interpretation of text thing is increasingly important in a world where <a href="http://tecfa.unige.ch/perso/staf/nova/blog/2006/01/20/the-economist-on-knowledge-workers/" rel="nofollow" >email is the most used way of communication</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Allen</title>
		<link>http://liftlab.com/think/laurent/2006/02/13/the-cause-of-flame-wars/#comment-335</link>
		<author>Christopher Allen</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liftlab.com/think/laurent/2006/02/13/the-cause-of-flame-wars/#comment-335</guid>
		<description>The original paper doesn&#8217;t actually say 50/50, instead, it says the chance of picking correctly the intent of irony vs sincerity was no better then random chance. I find this a much more accurate way to say it than a 50/50 chance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Choosing between irony vs sincerity is one of the toughest problems in plain text. One thing that makes it tough is that by convention we typically use &#8220;quotes&#8221; to show something is ironic. Yet this conflicts with using quotes for quotes, quotes for emphasis, and quotes for calling attention to a phrase — all common uses of quotes in text. No wonder we can&#8217;t interpret irony accurately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are also a number of other psychological and sociological causes for the cycle of flames, including over-interpretation of emotional content, emotional contagion, and lowered empathy during higher intensity emotions. I&#8217;ve written more about these in my blog at Flames: Emotional Amplification of Text: http://www.lifewithalacrity.com/2006/02/flames_emotiona.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original paper doesn&#8217;t actually say 50/50, instead, it says the chance of picking correctly the intent of irony vs sincerity was no better then random chance. I find this a much more accurate way to say it than a 50/50 chance.</p>
<p>Choosing between irony vs sincerity is one of the toughest problems in plain text. One thing that makes it tough is that by convention we typically use &#8220;quotes&#8221; to show something is ironic. Yet this conflicts with using quotes for quotes, quotes for emphasis, and quotes for calling attention to a phrase — all common uses of quotes in text. No wonder we can&#8217;t interpret irony accurately.</p>
<p>There are also a number of other psychological and sociological causes for the cycle of flames, including over-interpretation of emotional content, emotional contagion, and lowered empathy during higher intensity emotions. I&#8217;ve written more about these in my blog at Flames: Emotional Amplification of Text: <a href="http://www.lifewithalacrity.com/2006/02/flames_emotiona.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lifewithalacrity.com/2006/02/flames_emotiona.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Allen</title>
		<link>http://liftlab.com/think/laurent/2006/02/13/the-cause-of-flame-wars/#comment-936</link>
		<author>Christopher Allen</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liftlab.com/think/laurent/2006/02/13/the-cause-of-flame-wars/#comment-936</guid>
		<description>The original paper doesn&#8217;t actually say 50/50, instead, it says the chance of picking correctly the intent of irony vs sincerity was no better then random chance. I find this a much more accurate way to say it than a 50/50 chance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Choosing between irony vs sincerity is one of the toughest problems in plain text. One thing that makes it tough is that by convention we typically use &#8220;quotes&#8221; to show something is ironic. Yet this conflicts with using quotes for quotes, quotes for emphasis, and quotes for calling attention to a phrase — all common uses of quotes in text. No wonder we can&#8217;t interpret irony accurately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are also a number of other psychological and sociological causes for the cycle of flames, including over-interpretation of emotional content, emotional contagion, and lowered empathy during higher intensity emotions. I&#8217;ve written more about these in my blog at Flames: Emotional Amplification of Text: http://www.lifewithalacrity.com/2006/02/flames_emotiona.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original paper doesn&#8217;t actually say 50/50, instead, it says the chance of picking correctly the intent of irony vs sincerity was no better then random chance. I find this a much more accurate way to say it than a 50/50 chance.</p>
<p>Choosing between irony vs sincerity is one of the toughest problems in plain text. One thing that makes it tough is that by convention we typically use &#8220;quotes&#8221; to show something is ironic. Yet this conflicts with using quotes for quotes, quotes for emphasis, and quotes for calling attention to a phrase — all common uses of quotes in text. No wonder we can&#8217;t interpret irony accurately.</p>
<p>There are also a number of other psychological and sociological causes for the cycle of flames, including over-interpretation of emotional content, emotional contagion, and lowered empathy during higher intensity emotions. I&#8217;ve written more about these in my blog at Flames: Emotional Amplification of Text: <a href="http://www.lifewithalacrity.com/2006/02/flames_emotiona.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lifewithalacrity.com/2006/02/flames_emotiona.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
