<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Talk at Lift07: Embracing the Real World&#8217;s Messiness</title>
	<link>http://liftlab.com/think/fabien/2007/02/11/talk-at-lift07-embracing-the-real-worlds-messiness/</link>
	<description>Fabien Girardin</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 22:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Irons</title>
		<link>http://liftlab.com/think/fabien/2007/02/11/talk-at-lift07-embracing-the-real-worlds-messiness/#comment-339296</link>
		<author>Larry Irons</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liftlab.com/think/fabien/2007/02/11/talk-at-lift07-embracing-the-real-worlds-messiness/#comment-339296</guid>
		<description>Fabien, I appreciate the mention. Messiness is an apt term for the topic, though I'd suggest the term cuts both ways. The "visionaries" who advocate for seamless ubicomp enviornments, I would argue, consider the user messy and too often aim to take their decisions out of the situation in the name of "personalization". The point of view is implied in the paternalistic concept that seams are just too much information overload for the poor user. A seam is always a point of control, or power. It doesn't take a software engineer to know that seams never disappear in seamless interfaces, they just become unavailable to users.

The whole mess is directly analogous to the early expert systems debate about whether those artificial intelligence applications were suited best to give advice to users making decisions, or make the decisions for the users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fabien, I appreciate the mention. Messiness is an apt term for the topic, though I&#8217;d suggest the term cuts both ways. The &#8220;visionaries&#8221; who advocate for seamless ubicomp enviornments, I would argue, consider the user messy and too often aim to take their decisions out of the situation in the name of &#8220;personalization&#8221;. The point of view is implied in the paternalistic concept that seams are just too much information overload for the poor user. A seam is always a point of control, or power. It doesn&#8217;t take a software engineer to know that seams never disappear in seamless interfaces, they just become unavailable to users.</p>
<p>The whole mess is directly analogous to the early expert systems debate about whether those artificial intelligence applications were suited best to give advice to users making decisions, or make the decisions for the users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7.5th Floor &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Hybrid City by Phil Hubbard</title>
		<link>http://liftlab.com/think/fabien/2007/02/11/talk-at-lift07-embracing-the-real-worlds-messiness/#comment-336619</link>
		<author>7.5th Floor &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Hybrid City by Phil Hubbard</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 05:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liftlab.com/think/fabien/2007/02/11/talk-at-lift07-embracing-the-real-worlds-messiness/#comment-336619</guid>
		<description>[...] that new technologies may not be more profound than those which preceded them and as previously argumented and published: The tendency to talk of new technologies in hyperbolic terms in unfortunate. One [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] that new technologies may not be more profound than those which preceded them and as previously argumented and published: The tendency to talk of new technologies in hyperbolic terms in unfortunate. One [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7.5th Floor &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Pure Sliding Friction Moment</title>
		<link>http://liftlab.com/think/fabien/2007/02/11/talk-at-lift07-embracing-the-real-worlds-messiness/#comment-333207</link>
		<author>7.5th Floor &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Pure Sliding Friction Moment</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liftlab.com/think/fabien/2007/02/11/talk-at-lift07-embracing-the-real-worlds-messiness/#comment-333207</guid>
		<description>[...] to my thesis: I now ditched the argumentation on messiness, but keep enjoying observing and recording moments of sliding friction. In that sense, this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] to my thesis: I now ditched the argumentation on messiness, but keep enjoying observing and recording moments of sliding friction. In that sense, this [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-03-09 : ITP AlumniBlender</title>
		<link>http://liftlab.com/think/fabien/2007/02/11/talk-at-lift07-embracing-the-real-worlds-messiness/#comment-331680</link>
		<author>links for 2008-03-09 : ITP AlumniBlender</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liftlab.com/think/fabien/2007/02/11/talk-at-lift07-embracing-the-real-worlds-messiness/#comment-331680</guid>
		<description>[...] 7.5th Floor Â» Blog Archive Â» Talk at Lift07: Embracing the Real Worldâ€™s Messiness "I rather preferred taking the role of the observer of the current integration of sensor technologies in our everyday life in order to question the seamlessness and calmness visions in ubiquitous computing." [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 7.5th Floor Â» Blog Archive Â» Talk at Lift07: Embracing the Real Worldâ€™s Messiness &#8220;I rather preferred taking the role of the observer of the current integration of sensor technologies in our everyday life in order to question the seamlessness and calmness visions in ubiquitous computing.&#8221; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7.5th Floor &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ubiquitous computing: visions, failures and new interaction rituals</title>
		<link>http://liftlab.com/think/fabien/2007/02/11/talk-at-lift07-embracing-the-real-worlds-messiness/#comment-328564</link>
		<author>7.5th Floor &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ubiquitous computing: visions, failures and new interaction rituals</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liftlab.com/think/fabien/2007/02/11/talk-at-lift07-embracing-the-real-worlds-messiness/#comment-328564</guid>
		<description>[...] Relation to my thesis: a collaborative follow-up from last year&#8217;s monologue at LIFT. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Relation to my thesis: a collaborative follow-up from last year&#8217;s monologue at LIFT. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7.5th Floor &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Questioning Ubiquitous Computing</title>
		<link>http://liftlab.com/think/fabien/2007/02/11/talk-at-lift07-embracing-the-real-worlds-messiness/#comment-319550</link>
		<author>7.5th Floor &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Questioning Ubiquitous Computing</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liftlab.com/think/fabien/2007/02/11/talk-at-lift07-embracing-the-real-worlds-messiness/#comment-319550</guid>
		<description>[...] to my thesis: This paper proved to be a rather timely reading (in continuation to train of thought started earlier this year at LIFT). From what I have seen in Innsbruck, these topics are still [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] to my thesis: This paper proved to be a rather timely reading (in continuation to train of thought started earlier this year at LIFT). From what I have seen in Innsbruck, these topics are still [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Echelle 1:1 et reprÃ©sentation grandeur nature &#171; Cartographier les nouveaux territoires</title>
		<link>http://liftlab.com/think/fabien/2007/02/11/talk-at-lift07-embracing-the-real-worlds-messiness/#comment-209253</link>
		<author>Echelle 1:1 et reprÃ©sentation grandeur nature &#171; Cartographier les nouveaux territoires</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liftlab.com/think/fabien/2007/02/11/talk-at-lift07-embracing-the-real-worlds-messiness/#comment-209253</guid>
		<description>[...] N&#8217;oublions pas que Borges mentionne deux Ã©tats de la carte Ã  Ã©chelle 1:1 : le projet abouti de l&#8217;empereur et les ruines qu&#8217;a laissÃ©es celui-ci aprÃ¨s son abandon. La carte 1:1 numÃ©rique est un projet. Ce projet procÃ¨de du mouvement naturel d&#8217;Internet qui est, comme l&#8217;Ã©crit D. Kaplan dÃ©crit dans un autre texte trÃ¨s juste, de tout connecter etÂ  de descendre dans lâ€™espace physique pour doter chacune de ses composantes dâ€™une â€œaura numÃ©riqueâ€?, en interaction potentielle avec toutes les autres&#8221;. Mais, comme il le montre, ce projet de l&#8217;interconnexion parfaite, censÃ© produire un ordre technologique rationnel, est maintenant assez avancÃ© pour qu&#8217;on devine qu&#8217;il n&#8217;est vraisemblablement qu&#8217;un rÃªve (ou un cauchemar). On a nommÃ© les computers des ordinateurs en franÃ§ais car la fonction supposÃ©e de ces nouvelles machines Ã©tait de mettre de l&#8217;ordre dans le monde. Ils ont pourtant contribuÃ©, autant sinon plus, Ã  l&#8217;Ã©mergence de dÃ©sordre, d&#8217;inattendu et d&#8217;irrationnel. Peut-on vraiment considÃ©rer les sociÃ©tÃ©s du temps de l&#8217;informatique comme plus ordonnÃ©es et plus prÃ©visibles que celles qui les ont procÃ©dÃ©es ? Fabien Girardin dans sa communication Ã  la confÃ©rence Lift 2007 et Hubert Guillaud dans le billet d&#8217;Internet Actu qui en rend compte questionnent la possibilitÃ© de construire des systÃ¨mes informatiques sans couture, sans coupure et sans panne. Ils mettent aussi en doute notre souhait profond de vivre dans un monde lisse, pilotÃ© par une technologie omniprÃ©sente, invisible, parfaite et sans bruit. Il est donc fort possible que dans les &#8220;empires&#8221; de demain cohabiteront plusieurs projets de Cartes NumÃ©riques DÃ©mesurÃ©es et DilatÃ©es toutes inconciliables entre elles, ainsi que les ruines de nombreux autres projets inaboutis et abandonnÃ©s. Et cela ne sera pas forcÃ©ment un mal. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] N&#8217;oublions pas que Borges mentionne deux Ã©tats de la carte Ã  Ã©chelle 1:1 : le projet abouti de l&#8217;empereur et les ruines qu&#8217;a laissÃ©es celui-ci aprÃ¨s son abandon. La carte 1:1 numÃ©rique est un projet. Ce projet procÃ¨de du mouvement naturel d&#8217;Internet qui est, comme l&#8217;Ã©crit D. Kaplan dÃ©crit dans un autre texte trÃ¨s juste, de tout connecter etÂ  de descendre dans lâ€™espace physique pour doter chacune de ses composantes dâ€™une â€œaura numÃ©riqueâ€?, en interaction potentielle avec toutes les autres&#8221;. Mais, comme il le montre, ce projet de l&#8217;interconnexion parfaite, censÃ© produire un ordre technologique rationnel, est maintenant assez avancÃ© pour qu&#8217;on devine qu&#8217;il n&#8217;est vraisemblablement qu&#8217;un rÃªve (ou un cauchemar). On a nommÃ© les computers des ordinateurs en franÃ§ais car la fonction supposÃ©e de ces nouvelles machines Ã©tait de mettre de l&#8217;ordre dans le monde. Ils ont pourtant contribuÃ©, autant sinon plus, Ã  l&#8217;Ã©mergence de dÃ©sordre, d&#8217;inattendu et d&#8217;irrationnel. Peut-on vraiment considÃ©rer les sociÃ©tÃ©s du temps de l&#8217;informatique comme plus ordonnÃ©es et plus prÃ©visibles que celles qui les ont procÃ©dÃ©es ? Fabien Girardin dans sa communication Ã  la confÃ©rence Lift 2007 et Hubert Guillaud dans le billet d&#8217;Internet Actu qui en rend compte questionnent la possibilitÃ© de construire des systÃ¨mes informatiques sans couture, sans coupure et sans panne. Ils mettent aussi en doute notre souhait profond de vivre dans un monde lisse, pilotÃ© par une technologie omniprÃ©sente, invisible, parfaite et sans bruit. Il est donc fort possible que dans les &#8220;empires&#8221; de demain cohabiteront plusieurs projets de Cartes NumÃ©riques DÃ©mesurÃ©es et DilatÃ©es toutes inconciliables entre elles, ainsi que les ruines de nombreux autres projets inaboutis et abandonnÃ©s. Et cela ne sera pas forcÃ©ment un mal. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Kraal</title>
		<link>http://liftlab.com/think/fabien/2007/02/11/talk-at-lift07-embracing-the-real-worlds-messiness/#comment-189544</link>
		<author>Ben Kraal</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 02:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liftlab.com/think/fabien/2007/02/11/talk-at-lift07-embracing-the-real-worlds-messiness/#comment-189544</guid>
		<description>I've just watched the video and I had to say that I really enjoyed your presentation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just watched the video and I had to say that I really enjoyed your presentation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brain Off &#187; Lift Post-Process</title>
		<link>http://liftlab.com/think/fabien/2007/02/11/talk-at-lift07-embracing-the-real-worlds-messiness/#comment-98473</link>
		<author>Brain Off &#187; Lift Post-Process</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liftlab.com/think/fabien/2007/02/11/talk-at-lift07-embracing-the-real-worlds-messiness/#comment-98473</guid>
		<description>[...] Had many discussions on OpenStreetMap. It&#8217;s highly regarded conceptually, but practically not many people have had the stomach for it. The workshops are there to address this steep learning curve, shoulder to shoulder style, but there are definitely much to be done on usability and engaging with multiple technical levels. The sparodic connectivity of the devices themselves, in Geneva&#8217;s urban canyons, had participants puzzled and it makes me realized that GPS receivers are not well designed for this at all .. they&#8217;re either for navigation or passive recording .. not the active recording of OSM. Fabien Giradin&#8217;s talk on Embracing the Real Worlds Messiness resonated strongly here .. we need to design the OSM experience to account for when it breaks, and things like the Yahoo Imagery helps greatly. Like Jan Chipchase, he has a strong eye for environmental details which reveal hidden truths, like English Sinks. As computers pervade more of life, strange interactions and broken infrastructure will become more common not less. I want to &#8220;Play with Noise and Disorder&#8221; and may draw up some maps of GPS reception strength here in Brighton. Fabien ended by comparing &#8220;seamless&#8221; design to strong AI, and asked &#8220;do we really want to live in a calm world?&#8221; (no, we seem to desire messiness). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Had many discussions on OpenStreetMap. It&#8217;s highly regarded conceptually, but practically not many people have had the stomach for it. The workshops are there to address this steep learning curve, shoulder to shoulder style, but there are definitely much to be done on usability and engaging with multiple technical levels. The sparodic connectivity of the devices themselves, in Geneva&#8217;s urban canyons, had participants puzzled and it makes me realized that GPS receivers are not well designed for this at all .. they&#8217;re either for navigation or passive recording .. not the active recording of OSM. Fabien Giradin&#8217;s talk on Embracing the Real Worlds Messiness resonated strongly here .. we need to design the OSM experience to account for when it breaks, and things like the Yahoo Imagery helps greatly. Like Jan Chipchase, he has a strong eye for environmental details which reveal hidden truths, like English Sinks. As computers pervade more of life, strange interactions and broken infrastructure will become more common not less. I want to &#8220;Play with Noise and Disorder&#8221; and may draw up some maps of GPS reception strength here in Brighton. Fabien ended by comparing &#8220;seamless&#8221; design to strong AI, and asked &#8220;do we really want to live in a calm world?&#8221; (no, we seem to desire messiness). [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
